Eskom   Home_pic
 
Home | Site map
Decrease font size   Increase font size   Print this page   E-mail this page
 
 
Profile
Southern Africa grid map
Key facts
Electricity:
from power station to customer
Organisational structure
Executive summary
Vision, values and
strategic objectives
Group five-year review
Downloads
Additional Information
Information Sheets
Keyword search
 
   
 
Business and sustainability performance review  
SECURING CONTINUITY OF SUPPLY  
 
Load shedding – demand exceeds supply | Stabilisation and recovery plan | Generation plant performance  
 
Transmission system performance | Distribution system performance | Primary energy  
   
 
Generation plant performance    
   
 
   
   
 
Measure Description of measure Unit of
measure
  Target 
2008 
  Actual 
2008 
  Actual 
2007 
  Comments
Unit capability factor (UCF) UCF measures the plant availability and provides an indication of how well the plant is operated and maintained %   ≥87,70    86,24    88,60    Not achieved, due to an increase in planned outages and higher-than-targeted UCLF
Energy availability factor (EAF) EAF measures plant availability (UCF above), plus energy losses not under the control of plant management (external) and internal non-engineering constraints %   ≥87,00    84,85    87,50    Not achieved due to coal quality and coal shortage problems, as well as increased planned outages and higher- than-targeted UCLF

(Note: the EAF is derived from the UCF reduced by an OCLF1 of 1,39%)
Unplanned automatic grid separations (UAGS/7 000 hours) UAGS measures the reliability of service provided to the electrical grid and the number of supply interruptions per operating period (7 000 hours on average) number   ≤1,60    2,80    1,76    Not achieved
                     
Unplanned capability loss factor (UCLF) UCLF monitors the progress in minimising outage times and power reductions resulting from equipment failure and other conditions of plant %   ≤4,20    5,13    4,34    Not achieved due to the significant increase in the load factor which has a strong correlation with UCLF
   
 
 
Unplanned automatic grid separations per 7 000 operating hours
 
 
Reasons for deviations from the targets

The increased growth in demand over recent years, combined with limited operational capacity, has resulted in a signiFIcant increase in the production required from existing power stations. In order to deliver on the continued demand, this increased production has, in many instances, led to plant components being stressed beyond their design operating parameters. This increased level of usage, combined with exceptionally wet conditions in January and February 2008, contributed signiFIcantly to a culmination of conditions that resulted in forced capacity losses.

Benchmarking Generation’s performance

The increased pressure on the available power stations highlighted the need to determine whether or not the existing coal-FIred stations are performing at world-class levels. A benchmark study of coal-FIred plant in Eskom and plants in international databases was conducted over the period 1998 to 2006. Results show that over a period of nine years, Eskom generating plant has performed consistently and markedly better than their international counterparts. The only point of caution is that the Eskom UCF (availability) showed a signiFIcant drop in 2007.

Despite the decline in performance over the past two years, our coal-fired plant performance continues to be among the best in the world.

Generation technical recovery plan

Generation launched the UCLF (unplanned capability loss factor) recovery action in February 2008. The aim is to stabilise power station performance to an acceptable level by winter 2008, and a predictable and sustainable power supply by the end of 2008. More recently, the Minister of Public Enterprises indicated that Eskom should restrict the total level of forced outages to within 2 500MW (2 000MW from UCLF and 500MW from OCLF). This relates to an annual average UCLF performance of 5,1% across the system.

Eskom power stations have been performing well when compared to international practice.

  Condition monitoring  

 

Any piece of equipment ages with time and use. As equipment ages, it is more prone to breakdown and failure, which is obviously not desirable. If the breakdown modes of the equipment are well understood, there are certain signals and events that can be used to pro-actively determine when the plant is close to failure. An analogy of this is the use of cholesterol measurements to give early warning of heart disease. Condition monitoring is the process of monitoring a parameter, or number of parameters, for equipment and to then use this information to indicate the condition or “health” of that item. Condition-monitoring information is used to identify a significant change that points to a possible failure which allows Eskom to take pro-active, preventative maintenance steps to prevent a breakdown.

 

The UCLF recovery strategy is therefore focused on addressing a multitude of factors, both skills and plant related. The following plant focus areas have been identified within which these issues are being addressed:
  • Coal plant (focus on wet coal handling)
  • Boiler plant (focus on boiler tube failures)
  • Generator and other electrical systems
  • Turbine and related plant
  • Ash removal systems

The current plant performance recovery initiative will extend over many years. In order to minimise negative customer impact, only the most critical issues can be dealt with in the short term, while many others will be blended into the normal maintenance cycle over years to come. Any limitation on us achieving the minimum level of required maintenance will provide a severe setback to the recovery programme and lead to unpredictable plant performance. For now, the outlook for unplanned outages remains high, although these are being managed on an ongoing basis to reduce customer impact. The overall level will only show sustainable improvement as the above interventions show significant progress.

  Click here for more details on the UCLF recovery strategy.
   
 
Generation plant performance       Back to top