Eskom   Home_pic
 
Home | Site map
Decrease font size   Increase font size   Print this page   E-mail this page
 
 
Profile
Southern Africa grid map
Key facts
Electricity:
from power station to customer
Organisational structure
Executive summary
Vision, values and
strategic objectives
Group five-year review
Downloads
Additional Information
Information Sheets
Keyword search
 
   
 
Consolidated group annual financial statements  
   
   
   
   
 
Directors’ report  
   
 

Information required by the Public Finance Management Act

Performance in terms of the shareholder compact

The performance of Eskom against the shareholder compact key performance indicators is shown in the table in the business and sustainability performance review.

The capital and financial efficiency targets in the compact were not met due to the significant increase in the cost of primary energy. This was mainly due to the increase in coal costs and the increased use of the open cycle gas turbines. Although the amount spent on capital was exceeded, two targets of the capital expansion section were not achieved. The operating efficiency and effectiveness targets were in many cases not met for the following reasons:
  • Generation experienced a reduction in energy availability, reflecting a decline in plant performance due to an increase in unit trips and increases of both planned and unplanned maintenance
  • equipment failure contributed to the many incidents on the transmission network
  • the distribution performance has not improved since the previous year and the business plan target was not achieved due to a higher number of planned interruptions for maintenance and refurbishment and an increase in unplanned interruptions, caused by an increase in conductor theft, energy theft and bad weather. Load shedding also had a negative impact on operational performance.

Losses through irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure
In terms of the materiality framework agreed with the shareholder, any losses due to criminal conduct or irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure, that individually (or collectively where items are closely-related) exceed R10 million, must be reported.

No material irregular or fruitless and wasteful expenditure has occured during the period.

Losses through criminal conduct – conductor theft
Losses due to conductor theft (including copper and cable) totalled R25 million (2007: R16 million), and involved 1 832 incidents (2007: 1 142 incidents).

Actions to combat conductor theft are managed by the Eskom conductor theft committee in collaboration with other affected state-owned enterprises and the police. The combined effort resulted in 520 arrests (2007: 372 arrests) and R5 million (2007: R2,7 million) was recovered during the year.

Losses through criminal conduct – fraud
No significant incidents of fraud occurred during the financial period. During the year an amount of R9,3 million was recovered relating to a fraud that was reported during the previous financial period.

Management of energy losses


Energy losses reflect the difference between the quantity of energy sent out from the power stations and the quantity metered as sold. Losses are categorised as technical or nontechnical in nature:
  • technical losses naturally occur when energy is transmitted through the network power lines depending on the type of power systems used and components being used
  • non-technical losses are the difference between total losses and technical losses. These are typically caused by
  • electricity theft, for example illegal connections and meter- bypass
  • errors in technical losses calculation or estimation
  • data quality or errors that distort technical information

Actual losses compared to Nersa MYPD allowed losses are as follows:

  2008  2007 
Energy losses GWh  GWh 
Nersa MYPD allowance 21 428  21 401 
Actual achieved 20 027  20 033 

The distribution and transmission energy losses for 2008 totalled 12 195GWh (5,45% of the energy purchased) and 7 832GWh (3,1% of the energy purchased) respectively. In total the line losses decreased from 8,4% in 2007 to 8,0% in 2008.

We have also independently benchmarked the Eskom energy loss percentage against other international utilities.

Based on the 2007 information, Eskom compared favourably against the participating distribution utilities and the results were within the first quartile of the best performing distribution utilities. The Eskom result was within the international benchmarked parameters of 5,6% to 12,07%

For internal evaluation purposes, we estimate distribution technical losses range between 50% and 60% of total losses. The actual percentage is influenced by factors such as load growth, network design, network ageing and illegal connections.

For internal evaluation purposes, we estimate distribution technical losses range between 50% and 60% of total losses. The actual percentage is influenced by factors such as load growth, network design, network ageing and illegal connections.

Eskom instituted the energy losses management programme to manage total losses from a holistic, integrated and best practice perspective. The implemented energy losses management programme has realised positive results. The level of energy losses has improved due to the increased interventions in the management of energy losses. These actual results achieved are better than the target energy losses allowed for by Nersa.

The programme incorporates the following key activities:
  • audit, measure and repair faulty customer meter installations
  • disconnect illegal connections and meter bypasses
  • ring-fence electrical networks to balance energy delivered with sales
  • implement tested technologies to manage energy losses
  • improve data accuracy
  • stakeholder communication strategies
  • introduction of pricing penalties for customers at both transmission and distribution level who are in breach of contractual/grid code requirements

  Click here for more detail of the investment in new technologies to reduce energy losses.
   
 
Directors’ report     Back to top