The capital expenditure plan of R343 billion (nominal) over
the next five years requires significant access to all funding
sources ie, equity, debt and appropriate revenue. Eskom has
determined that it can realistically raise directly from the
capital markets up to R150 billion during this timeframe,
which addresses both market appetite and maintenance of
credit rating metrics. The remainder will thus need to be
sourced from equity and electricity price increases. Eskom
has undertaken much financial modelling to determine the
optimum mix of equity and electricity tariffs within the context
of maintaining its credit rating to ensure sustainable access
to and cost-effective pricing of debt. The Nersa decision in
June 2008 has informed us of the residual funding gap, which
will require shareholder assistance beyond the R60 billion
already committed. The terms and conditions of this assistance
are currently under negotiation but it is certain to provide
a funding foundation from which rating agencies and other
lenders can take comfort.
Eskom’s funding philosophy remains to responsibly maximise
our access within the local market and diversify our
international borrowing opportunities.
Late in the financial year 2006/7 Eskom launched a new bond,
the ES26, and proceeded to tap the market predominantly via
this instrument throughout the year. Eskom was rewarded by
the Bond Exchange of South Africa (BESA) via its members by
receiving a Spire Award for the best new issuance for 2007.
This was achieved purely via local financing. During the year
new international facilities were negotiated and are linked to
spending on particular projects and hence will be drawn as
projects progress.
Eskom found it necessary to increase the authorised volume
of the ES26 and ES33 within the R65 billion domestic multiterm
note programme listed with BESA from R10 billion to
R15 billion each in order to meet ongoing investor demand.
Investor concerns regarding the vastness of the
funding requirement and sources thereof, resulted in
Eskom spreads versus government bonds widening
significantly during the year. During the year under
review our funding strategy unfolded well, however,
the final quarter brought rating agency actions that
provided an additional challenge. Eskom postponed
an intended international loan pending the outcome
of rating agency deliberations. This is expected to be
resolved in July 2008.
In January, in a bid to broaden liquidity of Eskom bonds,
Eskom formalised five banks to act as supplementary
market makers alongside Eskom. As this is a new
endeavour Eskom will evaluate it on an ongoing basis
and encourage its success in the interests of our
investors. |