Eskom   Home_pic
 
Home | Site map
Decrease font size   Increase font size   Print this page   E-mail this page
 
 
Profile
Southern Africa grid map
Key facts
Electricity:
from power station to customer
Organisational structure
Executive summary
Vision, values and
strategic objectives
Group five-year review
Downloads
Additional Information
Information Sheets
Keyword search
 
   
 
Business and sustainability performance review  
FINANCIAL REVIEW  
 
Financial performance overview | Achieving the requested price increases | Capital and funding strategies  
 
Procurement and supply chain | Information technology | Productivity performance  
   
 
Financial performance overview  
   
 
Eskom

The growth in electricity sales (GWh) was 2,9% compared to the sales growth of 4,9% in the previous year. The electricity price increase for 2007/8 was 5,9%. Primary energy costs increased from
R13 040 million in 2007 to R18 314 million in 2008. This is mainly due to the steep increase in coal prices and the extended use of the diesel-powered open-cycle gas turbines due to the reduced reserve margin in October 2007 and at the beginning of 2008.

Eskom received a dividend of R800 million (2007: R200 million) from its subsidiary Gallium Limited.

At the end of March 2008 an amount of R1 978 million (2007: R1 446 million) of the electricity trade debtors was older than 75 days, a substantial portion of which relates to pre-2001 service-level agreements. Refer to the financial statements for further information. Adequate provision has been made for impaired electricity debtors.

Eskom is not in a tax-paying position and the tax credit to the income statement was R354 million (2007: a tax charge of R2 407 million), which is mostly deferred tax. Some R417 million (2007: R1 377 million) in tax was paid to the South African Revenue Service during the review period.

Change in asset lives of generation plant

With many of Eskom’s power stations in the 30-year age group, the board deemed it prudent to extend the economic life of the power stations from 35 to 50 years. This change was treated as a change in estimate in terms of International Financial Reporting Standards. The impact of this adjustment was a reduction of R484 million in the depreciation charge for the current year.

International experience indicates that power stations generally have an economic life greater than
50 years, and there are examples of stations much older than this. The major indicator of the economic life of a power station is not the age of the plant, but rather the availability and cost of coal. It is much more costeffective to refurbish a power station than to build a new one, and with refurbishment it is possible to both significantly extend the life and improve the efficiency of a power station.

Embedded derivatives

The net impact on the income statement of changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives of the company is a fair value loss of R149 million (2007: R4 131 million fair value gain) and a fair value loss of R143 million (2007: R4 305 million fair value gain) for the group. At 31 March 2008, the embedded derivative assets amounted to R12 713 million (2007: R8 686 million) and the embedded derivative liabilities to R5 084 million (2007: R914 million) for the group.

The forward electricity price curve used to value the embedded derivatives was 27,5% for the 2008/9 year, 25% for the next three years, 18% for the 2012/13 year and CPI plus 2% thereafter. A sensitivity analysis for the embedded derivatives appears in note 3.

Revenue and credit management

Eskom maintains systems, procedures, processes, and training programmes to ensure efficient and effective revenue management. In addition, adequate cash collection and investment management processes were in place throughout the period under review.

This is covered in detail in note 3 of the financial statements.

Valuation of assets and impairments

There is cross-subsidisation between certain customer categories (depending on electricity consumption, geographical location and voltage supply). However, Eskom recovers all the costs of supplying electricity to its overall customer base and earns a positive return on assets. On this basis, the directors believe that no adjustment is required to the value of assets relating to any particular customer category.

The directors believe that, based on the principle of crosssubsidisation, there is no need to raise a provision for the impairment of certain classes of property, plant and equipment in the current period. It might, however, be necessary for Eskom to raise a provision for impairment in respect of certain classes of assets in future years, depending on the nature of the planned restructuring of the electricity distribution industry.

Subsidiaries
Eskom Enterprises (Pty) Limited group

Turnover for the year was R5 456 million (2007: R4 457 million). Net profit after tax from continuing operations was R366 million (2007: R896 million) while the loss from discontinued operations was R13 million (2007: R57 million), resulting in a total profit of R353 million (2007: R840 million). Of this, R311 million (2007: R845 million) is attributable to the equity holder and R42 million (2007: loss of R5 million) is attributable to minorities. (The profit for 2007 was favourably impacted by the reversals of impairment provisions raised in previous years.)

The actual performance of the group for the year was substantially better than expected due to additional maintenance and the capital expansion programme work received from Eskom divisions, Anglo Coal and the Department of Minerals and Energy. The turnaround strategy implemented at Arivia.kom (Pty) Limited (arivia.kom) during the previous year has reaped tremendous benefits, with the company achieving a profit before tax of R88 million (2007: loss of R7 million).

Disposal of MKC

Eskom Enterprises disposed of its investment in Mountain Kingdom Communications (Pty) Limited (MKC) on 31 March 2008, for R68 million, resulting in a loss at group level of R142,7 million. Eskom Enterprises was released from its letter of support for a R156 million loan from Standard Lesotho Bank to Telecom Lesotho as part of the MKC disposal.

Disposal of arivia.kom

Transnet and Eskom are currently working on the outsourcing and disposal of the arivia business. Following a public release of an expression of interest document and a rigorous adjudication process, a shortlist of prospective bidders has been drawn up. It is expected that the sale will be completed by 31 March 2009.

  Click here for more details on Eskom Enterprises group business interests earmarked for sale.
Escap Limited and Gallium Insurance Company Limited

Eskom’s captive insurance subsidiary companies, Escap and Gallium, continue to provide a full range of customised shortterm insurance products to the Eskom group.

While Escap’s underwriting loss for the year is R54 million (2007: underwriting profit of R86 million), it showed a net profit after tax of R87 million (2007: R186 million), reflecting the effect of investment returns.

Gallium continues to be used on a limited basis, with Escap fulfilling substantially the full insurance mandate for Eskom. The ongoing role of Gallium is considered on a year-by-year basis.

Gallium’s underwriting profit for the year is R10 million (2007: R109 million), with a net profit of R63 million (2007: R200 million). Gallium paid a dividend of R800 million to Eskom during this financial year (2007: R200 million).

 
ate of return on assets
 
   
 
Financial performance overview     Back to top