|
||||||||||||||
| Information key: | ||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
Group Services division |
![]() |
Mandate
Provide long-term, sustainable business performance and growing stakeholder confidence through functional leadership and strategic guidance to Eskom in the fields of risk, sustainability (safety, health, environment, climate change and quality), and operational execution in the areas of innovation, corporate social investment, information management and research.
Although operational units are responsible for the execution of risk, safety, health, environmental and quality policies and procedures, the overall group performance is monitored and reported on by Corporate Services.
| Highlights | Future priorities |
|
|
| Challenges | |
|
|
Benchmarking
Eskom’s sustainability performance has been benchmarked against that of a selected number of other electricity utilities as set out in the table below. In some cases, their technology mix is not completely aligned with Eskom’s. All information was sourced from the utilities’ annual reports.
| Eskom1 2011 |
Utility 1 in Europe |
Utility 2 in Europe2 |
Utility 3 in Europe |
Utility in China |
Utility 1 in USA |
Utility 2 in USA |
Utility in Latin America |
Utility in the United Kingdom |
||||||||||||
| Utility and country | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total electricity produced (TWh) | 237 | 225 | 288 | 159 | 161 | 187 | 195 | 185 | 32 | |||||||||||
| Electricity generation mix: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Coal-fired power stations (%) | 92.8 | 56.0 | 27.6 | 44.8 | 81.0 | 57.0 | 66.0 | 0.4 | 35.6 | |||||||||||
| Renewables (%) | 0.8 | 4.0 | 32.33 | 23.3 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 92.94 | 15.5 | |||||||||||
| Pumped storage and other (%) | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | |||||||||||
| Gas (%) | 0.1 | 19.0 | 15.3 | 5.7 | 17.6 | 16.0 | 22.0 | 0.0 | 47.7 | |||||||||||
| Nuclear (%) | 5.1 | 20.0 | 11.9 | 26.2 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 0.0 | |||||||||||
| Environmental performance | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Water usage [L/kWh SO] | 1.35 | 1.73 | 0.22 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.09 | |||||||||||
| CO2 [kg/kWh SO] | 0.99 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.43 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 | |||||||||||
| Particulate emissions [g/kWh SO] | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | |||||||||||
| SO2 emissions [g/kWh SO] | 7.75 | 0.29 | 1.12 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 2.54 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 0.32 | |||||||||||
| NOx [g/kWh] | 4.18 | 0.58 | 1.38 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.59 | |||||||||||
| Social performance: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Employee work-related fatalities | 6 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Contractor fatalities | 18 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Employee and contractor fatalities | 24 | 2 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Material issues |
![]()
The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico ended with the adoption of the Cancun Agreement in which countries agreed that they need to work to stay below a 2°C temperature rise by lowering emissions. The agreement also adopted enhanced financial and technological support as well as capacity building for developing countries, both in terms of mitigation and adaptation to climate change.
South Africa continued to play an active role in the negotiations. Key national positions were: support for the multilateral process, the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol and advocating a legally binding outcome for the climate negotiations at international level that would bind developed countries to economy-wide, quantified emission reduction commitments. Currently there is no CO2 allocation framework in South Africa. However, Eskom has been active in the international and national climate change policy development process. As such Eskom has aligned its medium- to long-term strategy and plans with South Africa’s national climate change response policy development process. As part of the South African delegation to the international climate change talks, Eskom plays an advisory role to ensure the appropriate development of the future climate change regime taking into consideration growth, security of energy supply and the energy needs of South Africa, the Southern Africa region and Africa as a whole. Adaptation strategyIn the last year Eskom also started developing its adaptation strategy to prepare for the impacts of climate change and the effects on infrastructure and people. The aim of the strategy is to make recommendations to increase the organisation’s capacity to adapt and increase resilience to the negative impacts of climate change. Eskom signed its first Emission Credits Purchase Agreement (ECPA) with European-based bank, BNP Paribas in September 2010. This is the outcome of an open enquiry for bids to develop the clean development mechanism (CDM) for Eskom’s compact fluorescent light (CFL) programme. This was the first time that Eskom used the global carbon market to achieve its sustainability objectives, and this will form the basis for similar future agreements. The carbon assets that will be created from this project are certified emissions reductions and voluntary emissions reductions that will be traded with BNPP. South Africa’s responses to climate changeSouth Africa will host the next round of climate change negotiations in Durban in December 2011. South Africa has published the Green Paper on National Climate Change Response as well as a discussion paper on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through a carbon tax for public comment in 2011. The green paper encompasses South Africa’s aspirations for sustainable development – prioritising poverty alleviation albeit within the context of sustainable development, with benefits to the climate. The country is also very vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change and the paper focuses on the adaptation measures and strategies required by various sectors. Government’s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) was published by the Department of Energy in 2010. The recommended “revised balanced plan” is geared towards a low carbon future and aligned with South Africa’s long-term mitigation scenarios. It allows greenhouse gas emissions to peak, plateau and decline in line with government’s aspirations. During the last year Eskom engaged in a review of its climate change activities. Going forward, Eskom is completely committed to reducing its carbon footprint and helping South Africa achieve its aspirations by moving towards a cleaner energy mix. The plan is to increase the share of nuclear and renewables (through allocations from the IRP), continue investigating clean coal technologies and accelerate efforts in energy efficiency and biomass co-firing. The aim is to reduce Eskom’s total CO2 emissions from a maximum in 2022 to a reduction in relative and absolute terms by 2030. |
![]()
Eskom’s internal energy efficiency campaign entails implementing energy savings projects within company facilities and educating employees on how to save energy.
Educating employees on how to save energyEmployee programmes focused on hot water management such as solar water heaters, heat pumps, geyser blankets, reducing conventional geyser temperatures to 60°C, and using low-flow showerheads. Engagement methods included industrial theatre, informative presentations and interactive competitions.
Initiatives during the year
A key challenge is the installation of metering at all key facilities which has delayed the development of the Eskom baseline, as metered data is required to improve the credibility of an overall Eskom baseline and verified savings against the 15% national energy efficiency strategy target. Eskom will now focus on
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



